|
|
Return to Home Page
On
Giving Children the Sense of the Beautiful
Invisibly,
very near us, touching us all, is a real world, of divine order and beauty,
inhabited by spirits, whose mission it is to bring order and beauty, where
they can, to mortal souls who are struggling for such things…The
greater poetry is a flowing in of light from the source of all light,
from that King, from Whom comes our knowledge of the kingly, in Whose
wisdom we advance, under Whose majesty we move, and in Whose beauty, if
we have cared for beauty, we may come to dwell. His ways are the ways
of light, vouchsafed…, that this world may know a little of the
wisdom, beauty and power which are the daily bread in Paradise.
John
Masefield (1878-1967), Poetry, pp. 59-60
There are
some so blessed by ancestral and parental piety that, even in early childhood,
they possess a sense of inward beauty, that is the taste of holiness,
and so understand that human destiny is Divine. The greatest example is
that of the Holy Virgin, who at the age of four went to live in the Temple
in Jerusalem. However, we also know of many examples of child saints or
saints who, as small children, entered monasteries and convents and understood
liturgical beauty, a reflection of the inward beauty of the holiness of
God.
True, such
spiritual sensitivity and intuitiveness are now extremely rare. Today,
the vast majority of children have little sense of outward
beauty, let alone inward beauty. Nevertheless, all children
can be taught a sense of outward beauty. This is most important in modern
society, which exalts the cult of ugliness. Today’s cult of the
ugly is justified by claims that it merely reflects reality. Although
it does indeed reflect the very worst of reality, the extremes of human
sinfulness and lack of repentance, it does not reflect the reality of
most. Certainly, it does not reflect the reality of the higher and nobler
in humanity, its spiritual and religious ideals. Poetry, idealism, elegance,
refinement, delicacy and femininity, today all belong to the unfashionable
and mocked category. In reality, the contemporary cult of ugliness does
not reflect reality, but simply drags down humanity to its own brute level,
that of the lowest common denominator.
Thus, even
eighty years ago ‘modern’ art was called ‘the corpse
of beauty’ by the Russian philosopher Sergius Bulgakov. The same
term can be used for most modern music, sculpture, literature, architecture
and fashion. The same is also true of most modern television, music and
computer games, with their worship of foul language, debauchery and violence
(1). Today’s standards are set by the cult of ugliness. The standards
set for today’s children are either that of the alien monsters and
demons of an imagined, but possibly real, science fiction future or else,
similarly, the demonic imagery of a real pagan past. For that pagan past
is now resurfacing, whether in interest in Japanese monsters, Chinese
dragons and superstitions (feng-shui), African tribal art and masks, Indian
gods and buddhas, Germanic mythology, Celtic spiritism (Hallowe’en),
Egyptian corpses and sphinxes, or cruel Greek and Roman fables.
What models
of outward beauty can parents then provide for their children today, as
alternatives and antidotes to the contemporary cult of ugliness?
Firstly,
children can be taught very easily of natural beauty,
the beauty of the infinite variety of the natural world. For example,
even fathers and mothers who live in flats in big cities without gardens,
can take their children to parks and show them flowers and butterflies,
spring blossoms and autumn leaves, pointing to the beauty of the clouds
and the stars, sunrise and sunset. Others may be able to take their children
to the country, to national parks, to the sea and the ocean and show them
the beauty of hill and lakes, woods and fields.
Here, it
is important not to fall into the trap of nature-worship, a trap which
in fact is idolatrous, the worship of natural beauty for its own sake.
This trap, which forgets that nature is now in a fallen state, can lead
to pagan environmentalism and all its rites.
Secondly,
children can be taught of manmade beauty, the beauty
of the arts, of music, literature, painting, sculpture, architecture and
other forms of human creativity, which in Greek is ‘poetry’.
For example, fathers and mothers can take their children to exhibitions,
galleries, museums, concerts or to different towns. If this is not possible,
then they can simply give their children beautiful images and pictures,
which they can cut up and put into scrapbooks.
Here, it
is important not to fall into the trap of aestheticism, a trap which in
fact is idolatrous, the worship of manmade beauty for its own sake. This
trap, which forgets that all human creativity is imperfect, can lead to
elitist snobbery, narcissistic vanity and priggish pride.
Thirdly,
children can be taught of moral beauty, the beauty of
moral human relations. For example, the mutual love of father and mother
for one another and their children can provide a lifetime example of self-sacrifice
for them. If this is not given, as so often in today’s world of
no effort at self-improvement and renunciation for the other, and so separation
and divorce, children can grow up in moral distress and easily become
psychologically unbalanced.
Here, it
is important not to fall into the trap of ancestor-worship, a trap which
is in fact idolatrous, the worship of our forebears for their own sakes.
This trap, which forgets that our parents are merely part of creation
and not creators themselves, can lead to the exclusion of the Divine.
Finally,
through such a hierarchy, proceeding from natural beauty
to manmade beauty and on to moral beauty,
children may not only be able to appreciate something of outward
beauty, but also to learn of inward or spiritual beauty,
which, beyond the outward, is a much higher beauty. For, although outward
beauty exists in this world, it is but a reflection of much higher, inward
beauty, the spiritual beauty of holiness, the beauty of God. For every
beauty in this world, however fine, is but the image and shadow of ultimate
beauty, the beauty of the Divine Prototype and Creator. As the poet wrote:
If God hath made this world so fair,
Where sin and death abound,
How beautiful, beyond compare,
Will paradise be found.
James
Montgomery (1771-1854), The Earth is Full of God’s Goodness
Fr Andrew
Holy
Great-Martyr James the Persian
27 November/10 December
Note:
1.
Compare today's films with:
'Obscenity
in word, gesture, reference, song, joke, or by suggestion, is forbidden...
Scenes of passion should not be introduced when not essential to the plot.
In general. passion should be so treated that these scenes do not stimulate
the lower and baser element...No film may throw ridicule on any religious
faith. Ministers of religion, in their character as such, should not be
used as comic characters or as villains. Ceremonies of any definite religion
should be carefully and respectfully handled'.
From
the code of ethics adopted by the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors
of America on 31 March 1930.
|
|
|
|