|
|
Return to Home Page
THE
HOLY SPIRIT LOST:
BRAVE NEW RELIGION
If
you examine all the errors of the West, whether in its doctrines or in
its moral values, then you will see that they are all rooted in the failure
to understand that Christianity is the ascetic feat of gradual human self-perfection.
Metropolitan
Antony of Kiev (+1936)
FOREWORD:
A DEFINITION OF TERMS
The
world's unwisdom brings Death.
John
Masefield, The Bluebells, P.121
Although
what follows is written about post-Christian English society, most of
it is true of all modern Western societies. It is also therefore partly
true of all Westernised societies.
However,
the process of the decomposition of Heterodoxy is particularly advanced
in Protestant societies, more so than in the somewhat more resistant Roman
Catholic societies. Thus the process of spiritual decomposition is particularly
advanced in a mainly Protestant nation like England, although in some
respects it could be argued that in parts of Protestant Scandinavia, Germany,
Holland and the United States, the process is even more advanced.
Throughout
this article we use the term 'the Church' to indicate the Orthodox Church
and the term 'Heterodoxy' to mean the Non-Orthodoxy of Roman Catholicism
and the Protestant denominations, which include Anglicanism.
INTRODUCTION:
THE NEW RELIGION - GOD SUBVERTED BY MAN
And
now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree
which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Matt.
3,10
From
a spiritual point of view, the most striking thing about modern English
society is the absence of living faith in the Holy Trinity, the loss of
the Holy Spirit. This nation is today very largely a spiritual desert,
a bankrupt, spiritual wasteland. God has become almost invisible in modern
England. Indeed, having lost faith, 'the death of God' was proclaimed
as long ago as the 1960s. Today probably only about 1% of English people
actually believe in and practise a form of Christianity which is recognisable
as such to Orthodox Christians.
This
does not mean to say that English society is irreligious or has a religious
vacuum. As it is said, 'Nature abhors a vacuum'. Modern English society
is in fact 'religious', but its brave new religion is humanism, the worship
of humanity. Once God has been dismissed, man remains. Humanism, essentially
a materialistic worldliness, is in fact often known by an alternative
name which means the worship of the world - secularism. And secularism,
or worldliness, has always been the enemy of Orthodox Christianity and
the Church, as the Apostle John the Divine long ago proclaimed.
The
brave new religion of humanism, the worship of humanity, is the idealisation
and idolisation, or deification, of the human race and its achievements,
including therefore all its sins. Paradoxically, humanism developed particularly
swiftly at a time of mass murderers, human-beings like Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung,
Hitler and Pol Pot. Humanism attributes to humanity 'rights' and 'dignity',
advocating the 'sacredness of human life', implying also therefore the
sacredness of its sins.
The
name 'humanism' is then a contradictory and inappropriate one. Orthodox
Christians would on the contrary assert that the only true humanism is
Christianity, which is centred on the divine and human natures of the
Person of Christ. To call the worship of fallen humanity, with all its
demon-inspired sinfulness 'humanism', is not only a deformation, but also
a slander and a lie. Humanism is anti-human, as can be seen in the lives
of the above humanist tyrants. To declare that God is dead is in fact
tantamount to declaring that humanity is dead.
Be
that as it may, humanism is in itself dangerously popular, because it
is the religion of self-worship. Bowing down before humanity, it preaches
the obvious attractions of self-exaltation, self-interest, self-flattery
and self-indulgence, materialistically glorifying the visible parts of
the human-being, the human body and mind. Its essentially illusory self-flattery
is the secret of its success. The humanist lives and moves inside the
bubble of the self, of egoism. Full of human vanity, humanism extols self-worth
and praises self-esteem.
Humanism
promotes overweening self-confidence and over-esteem, encouraging pleasure
and leisure. Centred on the human race, it is therefore one-dimensional
in its understanding of man and the whole universe. It says that man is
worthy, whereas in reality he is thrice-wretched, with the potential to
become worthy but only through the grace of God. That God died for our
sins is astonishing. That humanism denies that we have any sins is perhaps
even more astonishing.
THE
ORIGINS OF HUMANISM AND MODERN HETERODOXY
A
faith without miracles is no more than a philosophical system; and a Church
without miracles is no more than a welfare organisation like the Red Cross
St
Nicholas of Ochrid (+1956)
It
is the Orthodox Christian belief that a heresy such as humanism cannot
have originated in the Church, for the Church is the Body of Christ, operating
infallibly through the Holy Spirit. Humanism must therefore have originated
outside the Church in a loss of the Holy Spirit, in a degenerate teaching
or heresy of an offshoot of the Church.
Humanism
first appeared in the context of Roman Catholicism, a novel degeneration
of Orthodoxy born in the mid-eleventh century. Since humanism first clearly
arose at the very end of the eleventh century, it seems clear to us that
the origin of humanism is in the filioque, the heresy which lies at the
root of Heterodoxy.
The
Church proclaims that the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, originates
from God the Father and can pass through sinless human nature, as the
Spirit did through the sinless human nature of Christ, for example at
the Transfiguration. On the other hand, the filioque proclaims that the
Holy Spirit originates from the Son of God Who has become man. This clearly
implies the anti-spiritual statement that potentially the Holy Spirit
can therefore originate from any representative of Christ, that is, potentially
it can originate even from sinful human nature.
This
is the implication of the claim by those with the office of Pope of Rome
that they replace Christ, that they are 'Vicars of Christ', that the Holy
Spirit and therefore spiritual authority originates from them, that they
are infallible. Such a claim implies that, independently of whether individuals
are spiritual or possess sacred personal qualities, that is that they
are holy, they can be infallible, faultless, they can speak with the authority
of the Holy Spirit, with the mind of God.
If
you remove the concept that holiness, apartness from the world, the acquisition
of the Holy Spirit, are essential to speak with the mind of God, religion
becomes a mere secular institution, an institution of this world. For
if the infallible authority of the Holy Spirit is automatically inherited
by people without holiness, through a mere function or office, then religious
belief and practice become irrelevant. Human nature, is thus swollen and
exalts itself with unmerited authority and importance, it is deified.
This can be seen in the self-exaltation of the 'mystics' of the Middle
Ages.
It
was a historic sequence of steps over some five hundred years from this
loss of the Holy Spirit, from this despiritualised Roman Catholic proposition
of the filioque, initially strictly limited to the Papacy, to another
proposition. This was the much less restrictive and democratic Protestant
proposition that any human-being can speak with the authority of the Holy
Spirit, interpret the Scriptures and know the Truth, simply though confessing
faith in Christ. Protestantism is anti-Papist, although, or perhaps because,
in Protestantism everyone is a Pope. The Protestant proposition means
that any unspiritual human-being can exalt themselves and claim to be
inspired to interpret the Scriptures correctly, independent of spirituality.
This
Brave New World (to use Shakespeare's expression of the time) explains
how Protestantism became a mere set of moral propositions, once the real
and not imagined Holy Spirit and spirituality were taken out of religion.
Religion therefore became an institution of this world, morality was the
only active part of 'religion' left. In Protestantism the concept that
morality is the result of spirituality is therefore lost. For it, spirituality
is morality.
This
can be seen in Protestantism by its idolising of the Law of the Ten Commandments
of the Old Testament into which it fell back. The Ten Commandments were
placed in the east ends of Protestant churches, over the altars, where
in Orthodox churches is often painted the icon of Christ. The aim of Protestantism
became merely the production of 'law-abiding' citizens for the State to
control.
The
Protestant concentration on ethics and interpretive opinion, to the exclusion
of spirituality, leads to something else too. For if the Christian religion
is mere moral opinion, then there is no need for a God at all. It was
indeed another historic sequence of steps over some five hundred years
from Protestant ethicism to saying that all human-beings are in some sense
infallible - for anyone can form a moral opinion. This process came to
a culmination in the 1960s. The religion of secular humanism, the fag-end
of modern Protestantism, was born not by generation, but by a step by
step process of degeneration which took nearly a thousand years to fulfil:
Roman Catholicism; Protestantism; Humanism
Today
institutionalised Heterodoxy is rejected by the masses. Roman Catholicism
is but a disputed authority, much discredited by its clergy scandals.
As regards Protestantism, it has run its historical course. The English
offspring of Protestantism, the Church of England, appears to be a half-rejected
digest of diluted Calvinism, founded by a homicidal serial adulterer.
Having
long ago lost its appeal to those outside the middle-classes, the Church
of England is not comprehensive, it is merely incoherent, 'all things
to all men'. It has largely become anything to any men and no thing to
no men. Run by committees, the Church of England has little authority
or charisma. Its constant search for compromise, for the middle way, for
'tolerance', its constant fudges, its 'niceness', largely exclude the
concept of Absolute Truth.
In
fact, its fudges are signs of resistance to Truth, searches for compromise.
On the contrary, controversy and division, not compromises, have always
been signs of vitality in Church life, signs of the search for Truth.
The great Church Councils came about out of controversy. An organisation
which fudges is one which does not want to live by the Truth. Present
Church of England values appear to be merely the promotion of Establishment
liberal bourgeois notions of 'decency' and 'respectability'. Indeed, its
present Archbishop appears to take many of his views from the liberal
middle-class Guardian newspaper.
At
best, large parts of Heterodoxy are now an authorityless debating society
- without authority because without spirituality. Its ministers appear
to have turned into amateur social workers, who busy themselves with the
material and mental welfare of their clients. At worst, however, Heterodoxy
appears to be a spiritual vacuum, a form of Christianity which is religionless,
because it is Churchless. For without the Church, the Body of Christ,
there is no Holy Spirit, no life in Christ, no knowledge of Christ, no
authentic Christianity, no spiritual and therefore no moral authority.
Heterodoxy appears only to have ideas about Christ, no direct experiential
knowledge of Him. As one Anglican cleric asked me thirty years ago, when
I was making these same points: 'But what is the Holy Spirit?' It appeared
that he really did not know.
The
agenda of modern Heterodoxy appears to be set by the world and its humanist
ideology of social 'progressiveness'. Thus Heterodoxy merely reflects
the world, instead of leading it upwards. Spiritually empty, it is no
longer in control of the agenda, it merely reacts to what is predetermined.
Without its own authority, it recognises only the authority of those 'opinion-makers',
who manipulate and condition the masses with their secularist political
correctness through television and the other mass media.
This
thousand-year long process of degeneration of the West from the Church
to the brave new religion of humanism, now very advanced, has been the
inevitable result of the self-inflicted self-mutilation of Heterodoxy.
This has come about through the acceptance of all the long-term implications
of the filioque, the deification of human nature without God, without
the Holy Spirit. Spiritual bankruptcy has resulted in secular humanism.
This degeneration is the result of Heterodoxy's failure to first identify
and then exclude its own essence, its original error, the filioque. Once
this failure had taken place, the loss of the Holy Spirit and the consequent
loss of faith and the logical development of secular humanism were inevitable.
Albeit, after a long passage of time.
As
a result, Heterodoxy today has little distinctive or religious to say
to the world, for it mouths what the world already says. In the absence
of the Holy Spirit, it is unable to provide spiritual food, it even imitates
the architecture of the world and its modern churches are reflections
of worldly architecture. As regards sin and hell, it proclaims, like the
world, that everybody will be saved. We have in our times seen the reinstatement
of the heresy of Origen and its deification by humanists of all backgrounds.
The
adoption of humanism by the Heterodox denominations has had several results,
mainly since the 1960s. All religions, or 'faith communities', are now
considered to be equal, regardless of Truth. Syncretism, known as ecumenism,
has taken hold. But ecumenism is in fact secularism, a merger with the
world. Being outside the Church, Heterodoxy can have no doctrine or even
concept of 'The Church' and therefore its merger with the world is inevitable.
Liturgically,
this humanism has insisted on the removal from Heterodox worship of the
surviving sense of the sacred, the vestigial sense of mystery and awe,
for today humanism proclaims that only human life is 'sacred'. This can
be seen, for instance, in the humanist abolition of 'old-fashioned' liturgical
language or the reading aloud of secret prayers. Without the sense of
the sacred, Heterodox centres of worship are thus conveniently turned
into concert halls and secular clubs.
The
greatest symbol of this removal of the sacred is the turning around of
altars and clergy since the 1960s. In this way, instead of facing God,
ministers now face congregations. These ministers have literally turned
their backs on God. Human need is placed above divine service. The worthy
Act of God (worship) is ignored for the unworthy acts of man. Heterodoxy
seems to have forgotten long ago that the Church is about the Son of God
and the salvation of the soul, not about fallen man's smug self-satisfaction
and self-exaltation.
The
aim of humanist worship is to develop aesthetic sensation, 'the feel-good
factor', the exalting 'I'm saved' feeling. This 'charismatic' movement
is but a repeat performance of the delusions of nineteenth-century evangelical
revivalism and emotionalism. This can be seen in 'happy-clappy' churches,
the churches of 'therapy', the only 'successful' and full Protestant churches
today. However, they have no lasting impact or long-term value, with their
huge turnover of superficial believers.
Today
Heterodox religious belief, reflecting the secular world, has been individualised
and privatised. It reflects consumer choice. Any individual can pick and
mix from the supermarket menu of religion. Religion is customised for
its customers. People 'shop around' as a therapy for the most convenient
religion, regardless of Truth. 'Worship committees' devise new 'styles
of worship', new forms of emotional self-satisfaction. Worship is just
another recreational activity, a leisure time occupation, an empty shell,
because without the Absolute Revelation of the Holy Spirit, worship has
no authority, it is hollow. You can make up your own religion based on
secular, humanist ethics - after all religion is only a 'lifestyle choice'.
As
a result of this long process of degeneration, modern Heterodoxy faces
a meltdown, for it has come to profess secular ideals, those of spiritual
barbarism, of hell. In hell people are prisoners of their sins. And that
is the definition of humanist society - one in which people do not even
realise that they are prisoners of their own smug sinfulness, self-interest,
self-indulgence and self-satisfaction.
THE
LOSS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT AND HUMANIST RELIGION
All
social and intellectual changes are dependent on the existence of a spiritual
force without which they would not have been.
Christopher
Dawson,
Religion and the Rise of Western Culture
Humanism
has almost completely replaced Heterodox Christianity. The following Christian
dogmas have been usurped and replaced:
The
worship of the One God has been replaced with the worship of humanity,
the one human race. Belief in the Holy Trinity has been replaced by anti-racist
belief. Humanism, after all, is the worship of the human race in its unity
in diversity. Racism is therefore similar to disbelief in the Holy Trinity,
for racism expresses disbelief in the human race.
The
belief in the Virgin Birth has been replaced by the belief that humanity
is above sin and has sacred qualities.
The
belief in the two natures of Christ, the divine and the human, has been
replaced by anti-sexist belief. This is the belief that male and female
are two completely equal parts of humanity, identical in all ways.
The
belief in the Resurrection of Christ has been replaced by the belief in
constant social progress, the upward movement of humanity.
The
saints have been replaced by a host of 'celebrities', television 'personalities',
film, 'soap' and pop 'stars', sports 'personalities' and others. The details
of their 'Lives' are ardently studied, discussed and even fictionalised
in numerous publications and broadcasts. These celebrities especially
love giving each other celebrations, awards and prizes in the forms of
strangely-sculpted idols. People name their children in honour of these
contemporary 'saints', whose main 'contribution' to humanity appears to
be an increase in the use of foul language and aggressive behaviour and
the practices of alcoholism, drug-taking, fornication, adultery and homosexuality.
They then wonder why their children are so badly behaved.
The
Kingdom of Heaven has been replaced by the offers of various political
parties to develop an all-powerful and all-saving government system, the
'nanny-State'. Their aim is to promote human 'welfare', to meddle and
busybody like old-fashioned Lutherans in privacy and personal life, to
control individuals as far as possible, while maintaining the illusion
of 'freedom' and 'democracy'. Thus these illiberals will introduce compulsory
identity cards with biometric data - in the name of liberty.
Such
politicians have at their disposal large budgets to manipulate the masses.
With these budgets they implement the social propaganda of their coming
'heavenly kingdom' of humanism and secularism through their 'spin'. Thus
conditioned by State propaganda, people live with the illusion that they
are thinking for themselves. Our political 'Saviours' struggle to revive
'communities', but only because in this way they can save money by cutting
spending and exercise even more political control.
The
leaders of political parties take on the role of Messiahs who operate
miracles through 'social engineering'. Neo-puritans like 'St Margaret'
(Thatcher), revering the mass-murderer Cromwell, based her philosophy
on the self-help ethics of Protestantism. The greatest sin, she said,
was 'inflation'. Another neo-Puritan, 'St Tony' Blair preaches as a neo-Puritan
and mounts 'pious' Crusades against non-humanist countries and systems,
deluded by his own sincere illusions that he is saving the world when
in fact thousands die because of his actions. He is largely supported
by the ethics of Scottish Calvinism.
The
belief in forgiveness has been replaced by the doctrine of equality, which
automatically elevates us so that we no longer need forgiveness. This
can be seen in the campaigns to relieve Third World Debt. However justified
this may be, in itself it actually encourages irresponsibility. There
are no longer any sheep or goats: all are forgiven, all are equal.
This
doctrine of equality, which proclaims that however different we are, we
are still equal, leads to the abolition of excellence and the introduction
of mediocrity. The State invest large amounts of money on imposing its
egalitarian mediocrity through its social propaganda and the 'educational'
system, the egalitarian hell of which appears to reduce as many as possible
to a state of cretinism, through reduction to the lowest common denominator.
The devaluation of Education, chanted to the Leninist mantra of 'Education,
Education, Education', has ensured the appearance of semi-literate University
graduates. The ruling elite, of course, make sure that they are not part
of this.
The
belief in miracles has been replaced by the hope placed in medical technology.
Hospitals have become the monastic centres of modern times, where doctors
(saints) and nurses (angels) 'save' lives, i.e. delay death. The greatest
humanist saints of tomorrow labour in these 'monasteries' and their laboratories
of medical research. Without the concept of sin, these 'saints' work on
the 'salvation' of humanity. Thus geneticists will by genetic manipulation
solve the flawed inheritance of human nature and grant us long, semi-eternal,
life. As for general practitioners and psychologists, they and their surgeries
have become parish priests, to whom people go for healing and confession.
Humanism
believes in the sacrament of good health, the welfare system (often, in
reality, 'illfare'), into which English people are born, live and are
buried, 'from the cradle to the grave'. This system promotes our bodily
and mental welfare, so essential to soulless humanism. People are maintained
by Social Security and the National Health Service, the perfection of
which is their Holy Grail.
This
is why some of the most popular television programmes are situated in
hospitals. Here dramas are played out in the struggle against the terrible
enemy of humanism, death. Thus a great struggle goes on against the costly
practice of smoking, which leads to premature death. Those who work against
the sacredness of human life by indulging in the evil of smoking are made
to feel guilty, 'named and shamed'.
Prayer
has been replaced by non-Christian meditation. Fasting has been replaced
by a slimming and dieting industry with fads which aim to increase physical
beauty. Many of these fads have in reality actually led to self-mutilation,
for instance, through cosmetic surgery and death through anorexia. Almsgiving
and acts of mercy have been replaced by tax-free gifts to 'the charity
industry', where one can foster one's 'image' and promote public relations.
Communion
is now taken in the 'aisles' of other modern cathedrals, the supermarkets,
where they 'consume' the bread and wine of modernity through 'healthy'
foods which they freely choose. Here the cult of the body is fostered.
This is reinforced by countless television programmes and magazines about
cookery and wine with the cult of cooks and gourmets and their 'holy'
writings, best-selling recipes, which in fact induce greed and so obesity.
None of these of course ever speaks of the sin of greed, or the spiritual
causes or consequences of greed and obesity.
The
cult of the human body is reinforced in sport. The Olympic Games, Athletics
Meetings and Football Cups are multi-billion pound events. To ordinary
people, this artificially created need is met through sports centres,
swimming-pools, gymnasiums and fitness clubs in another multi-billion
pound spin-off.
The
cult of the importance of physical comfort is furthered by another huge
industry, that of 'D.I.Y' chains., with countless television series about
home improvements to make people more 'comfortable', again inflating the
bubble of 'self-expression', of human egoism. Humanism is always based
on emotional self-satisfaction, self-indulgence, self-exploration, self-enrichment,
self-exaltation. Always the smug self.
The
hope of salvation has been replaced by the desire to eliminate all bodily
and mental suffering, promoting the cult of pleasure. The development
of a leisure society and the reduction of all human activities to 'self-fulfilling'
and 'self-enriching' hobbies and pursuits. After all, the Protestant U.S.
Constitution states that the pursuit of 'happiness' is an essential human
right. You can do anything, 'as long as it makes you happy'.
Thus
we see the development of the entertainment society and the 'entertainment
industry', the pleasure culture. For those who cannot lull themselves
into insensibility through television, the media, entertainment, holidays,
tourism and alcohol, there are always the other drugs which the State
does not officially allow, but which are everywhere available. Pleasure
must be our aim - even if it kills us.
Precisely
because it idolises pleasure, humanism denies that God exists: for if
God existed, He would not allow pleasure-denying suffering. This particular
piece of human vanity and self-worship fails to see that in reality we
suffer because we sin. Denying that we sin, the self-flattering illusion
of humanism therefore fails to understand that we deserve to suffer. The
elimination of suffering through pain-killers deprives humanity of the
possibility of perceiving reality through Providential suffering and so
bringing it to repentance for sin. Yet, paradoxically, people suffer more
now because the expectation of suffering and death is taken away from
them, and living in a bubble of unreality, when reality does finally come,
they find it unbearable.
The
'spirituality' of humanism regarding death is extravagantly sentimental,
with its cuddly toys and 'floral tributes', as was seen most clearly at
the funeral of Princess Diana. Its funerals are prayerless 'celebrations
of life'. The 'thanksgiving for the life' of the deceased does not pray
for the departed, it concentrates on 'bereavement therapy', 'grief counselling',
with platitudes unworthy of children. Such secular funerals are in fact
celebrations of human weakness.
This
is reflected in the humanist attitude towards animals, which are seen
as extensions of human-beings. We find the same sickly sentimentalism
here because since humanism believes that we have no souls, animals therefore
are equivalent to human-beings. The cult of fluffy animals and cartoon
characters is therefore admissible. The worship of pets, the practices
of dressing them up and buying them luxury foods and presents is now commonplace.
Animal slaughter for meatfor non-vegetarians is naturally hidden away
in abbatoirs. How strange that this animal sentimentalism is not extended
towards all animate beings, for example, to killer bees or the AIDS virus.
The
brave new religion of humanism has many taboo words. These include:
Sin.
Repentance, judgement, redemption.
Fornication, adultery.
Hell, evil, the devil, demons.
Heresy.
Sin
was replaced in the 1960s with the belief that all human failings are
the result of social ills. ('Society's to blame'). At present the blame
has been shifted to 'the world'. Humanism asserts that sin does not exist,
that failings are never the fault of individual human-beings, for humanity
is above sin and failings are never its responsibility. Failings are always
the faults of systems exterior to humanity. As a result the 'moaning society'
has been created. It is a faithless, ex-Protestant society in which people
still constantly protest against systems, against faults outside themselves
and beyond their control. The words 'bellyache', 'whinge', 'whine', 'gripe',
'grumble' 'complain', 'fret', 'fuss', 'protest', 'lobby', criticise',
'nitpick', hairsplit' and countless synonyms are now in vogue. This is
a society of neurosis and neurotics.
Since
there are no sins, for humanity is above them, there can be no repentance
or need for it, no judgement or need for redemption. Instead, there is
massive guilt, which feeds industries of psychologists, counsellors, therapists
and mental health experts.
As
regards sexual sin, fornication and adultery, these are 'natural', there
are only 'lifestyle choices'. Cures for sexually transmitted disease will
solve all problems of sexual conduct.
Regarding
hell, all will be saved, therefore hell cannot exist, with its 'mythical'
evil, devil and demons. In reality, however, this is a society which,
having denied hell in the beyond, has created hell in its midst. Hell
is here in the prisons full to overflowing with sadistic murderers and
pedophiles. Hell is here in the mental hospitals with their schizophrenic
and paranoid cannabis-takers and suicides. Hell is here in the hospitals
with their 200,000 murders ('abortions') a year, the hospitals where in
the next ward, the elderly are artificially kept alive against their own
wills. All of them are conveniently hidden from humanist daily life.
Religious
heresy does not exist either. All opinions are submitted to humanism.
Instead of saying that all religions have a partial and fragmentary knowledge
of God but that the Church alone has at its disposal the whole Truth,
the views of humanism with regard to other religions are reductionist,
relativist and syncretistic.
Having
rejected the unique miracle and unique revelation of the Incarnation of
the Son of God, there are no longer any Absolutes and any Revelation.
Humanism asserts that 'everything is relative'. Revealed Truth cannot
exist, because it would imply the miraculous and the existence of a Divine
Revealer dwelling beyond time and space - quite unacceptable to humanism.
All miracles are therefore merely 'symbolic' and all 'traditional' religions
are equal, inasmuch as they are mere relics or 'symbols' of primitive
societies and their folklore. The language of humanism is the coded language
of political correctness, a language which has no regard for the Truth
- which is an Absolute and therefore is banned.
CONCLUSION:
DESPAIR AND HOPE
Those
whose duty as members of (the Body of the Lord) is to preserve the purity
and authenticity of His truth are as faithful as they have ever been.
They need to direct their mission to the Christian remnant in England,
for there is work to be done'.
Very
Rev Dr Edward Norman, Chancellor of York Minster
'Secularisation', P.159, Continuum, 2002
To Orthodox missionaries coming from abroad (and I am one of them) modern
English society presents a very strange face. Often we feel as imaginary
visitors from other planets might feel, such are the strange contradictions
and incongruities of modern life in England. The loss of faith and so
the advance of practical and theoretical paganism under the mask of humanism,
has been very rapid. A once Christian nation now wallows in depravity.
There is astonishment at how quickly a once Christian society can lose
the Holy Spirit, can lose its faith, crumble and collapse. However, an
analysis of the problem shows us that the roots of the essential problem
of the loss of the Holy Spirit, the loss of faith, lie deep within the
inner workings of Heterodoxy and stretch back nearly one thousand years.
For
this reason the collapse of Heterodox Christianity in England has not
taken place because of fierce persecution or because it has been rejected
from the outside. The collapse has occurred from inside, its collapse
has been voluntary, self-inflicted, suicidal, the result of the internal
logic of a false doctrine, the filioque. The loss of the Holy Spirit,
the loss of faith has not occurred because English Heterodox have been
persecuted, but because the essential nature of English Heterodoxy has
for centuries been worldly and world-loving.
Without
the Tradition of the Church, without the guidance of the Holy Spirit,
without monastic life, Heterodoxy has gradually, at first imperceptibly,
then perceptibly, openly encouraged and then fallen into worldliness.
The brave new religion of secular humanism has in fact developed because
worldliness has since the mid-eleventh century been an integral and systemic
part of Heterodoxy.
There
is reason for despair only if one has oneself lost faith. But those who
still have faith also know that the present great apostasy can be reversed.
At the beginning, at Pentecost, there were only the Twelve. But an Empire
fell to them. The same can happen again, if humanity turns back to Christ.
Although it may seem unlikely that humanity will yet return, like the
Prodigal Son to the embrace of the Father, to a new age of the Christian
Faith, to the rediscovery of the Holy Spirit, the last word in history
has not yet been uttered. And this is our hope.
Fr
Andrew
Sunday
of the Prodigal Son, 2004
|
|
|
|