|
|
Return to Home Page
GOOD-BYE, MR BLAIR?
In a new age of darkness, light will eventually return.
Anon.
An
arrogant liar. A war criminal. A smug hypocrite. A self-satisfied Calvinist
preacher. A meddler who doesn't listen. A self-deluded megalomaniac.
Such
are some of the insults proffered to Mr Blair by some. The recent disastrous
election results for 'New Labour' indicate that the time is coming for
Mr Blair to leave. Whatever one thinks of his political legacy, few would
deny that it will take years, perhaps decades, for the United Kingdom
to recover from the Blair years.
Fed
up with the corruption of the Conservative Major government and tired
of paying taxes for third-world public services, in 1997 the British public
voted for a change of government, a mandate for 'New Labour' which was
renewed in 2001. Unfortunately, over the last seven years they did not
receive what they voted for. Stories of corruption continue, for instance
those concerning Labour Party funding. And as regards public services,
in its first term of four years, New Labour did nothing to improve public
services, but instead continued Conservative policies. The present situation
of hopelessly underfunded and crumbling public services is this:
The
Leninist mantra of 'Education, Education, Education' of Mr Blair (1)
has led to a demoralized workforce of teachers: Demoralized because they
are still crushed by the bureaucratic paperwork of 'initiatives' from
a Government Department which has lost its grip on the reality in classrooms.
Demoralized because ill-behaved children are still allowed to ignore discipline,
for they are granted rights which teachers do not have. Mr Blair is also
responsible for the continuing dumbing down of the exam system, started
long ago by the Conservatives, with the result that children work very
hard for very meagre results; depth of study has been sacrificed to breadth
of study. Mr Blair is also responsible for the huge debts of seven years
of University students, who are no longer granted money to pay for their
studies, but are given loans, whereby they start their working lives in
debt (on average about £15,000 each) to the all-powerful financial
system.
The
health system falters and fails. Even with skilful statistical manipulation
by the accountant-obsessed government, waiting lists for operations and
consultations are still scandalously long, in some cases up to two years.
No doubt the logic behind this is that the sick will die before they see
a doctor and can thus be eliminated from waiting-lists altogether. The
crisis in dentistry has worsened drastically and now only about half of
British people have dentists, with the result that some poorer people
resort to DIY dentistry, as in the nineteenth century. The results can
be imagined.
Public
transport is in a critical state. The London Tube is an expensive laughing-stock.
Public train services are complex, unreliable, incredibly expensive and
sometimes simply dangerous.
The
fact is that the Blair government has been obsessed by 'photo-opportunities',
'presentation' and 'image', what is called 'spin', which is another word
for propaganda, which is another word for lies. Announcements are made
of rises in investment, sometimes up to twenty-two times for the same
meagre investment. No wonder that criticisms are made that the Blair government
is a government without any substance. Seldom has any politician broken
so many promises as Mr Blair. But even less seldom has any politician
deluded himself into thinking that he has not broken any promises at all.
What
has also irritated British people are the many tax rises, 'stealth taxes',
implemented by the Blair government. If at least public services had improved,
perhaps people would accept the cunningly-imposed, astronomical rises
in taxation. But not when public services continue to deteriorate and
public money is wasted on the useless, but politically correct, initiatives
of overpaid bureaucrats, while criminals roam the streets, because the
prisons are too full to house them.
Of
course, Mr Blair boasts of economic success, though that was largely due
to the economic common, if sometimes cruel, sense of the Thatcher governments.
And in fact Mr Blair's 'success' is largely based on the illusion of an
incredible bubble of house-price inflation, which he has only encouraged,
and the trillion pounds of debt that he has encouraged the public to fall
into. Once more the financial sector gloats - but only for a time. The
chickens will come home to roost in a huge bust after the boom. Bubbles
always burst: such is the law of physical and economic nature. And bubbles
of egoism also always burst. Such is the law of human nature.
Mr
Blair sympathized with America on 9/11. Indeed, virtually all the people
of Britain felt a profound wave of solidarity with their cousins, ordinary
Americans. However, in reality, Mr Blair's sympathy was not with the American
people, but with the oil-thirsty American elite. And that is why Mr Blair
began to behave like a cowboy.
Did
nobody tell Mr Blair that the 'Indians' fought the cowboys because they
wanted to protect themselves and their families, because the cowboys were
stealing their ancestral lands and their mineral wealth? Did nobody tell
Mr Blair that the Palestinians have the same grievances against the newly-arrived
Israelis? Did nobody tell Mr Blair that terrorists have reasons for such
bitterness? Find the solution to their grievances and most people will
then become reasonable.
Internationally,
Mr Blair has renewed the old charges of Imperialist arrogance brought
against Great Britain. His interventions in Serbia, Afghanistan and Iraq,
all anti-democratic, all against the United Nations, have been catastrophic.
He has allowed the ancestral lands of southern Serbia to be almost completely
ethnically cleansed of Serbs by Albanian immigrants and drug-runners,
as also the Serbian part of Croatia. NATO troops strut around many parts
of ex-Yugoslavia, profiteering from their position. Their presence there
will have to be permanent, until justice is done and the festering resentment
of the oppressed Serbs is assuaged by their eventually reclaiming what
is their own.
Afghanistan
and Iraq are both ruled by American puppet governments, with no legitimacy.
Everybody knows that those countries will topple into blood-soaked anarchy
once the forces of intervention, which created the conditions for that
anarchy, depart. Mr Blair does not seem to realize that although situations
in some foreign countries are dire, meddling generally only worsens such
situations, which have deep roots in history far beyond Mr Blair's knowledge.
If he really believes in the rights of certain countries to 'pre-emptively'
invade others, then why has he not long ago invaded Tibet, Zimbabwe, Belorus',
Uzbekistan, the Sudan, Israel, Turkey and countless other nations whose
governmenets oppress their own peoples and minorities? Why not spend (or
waste) billions of British taxpayers' money, naturally without consulting
them about, it on invading those countries to free them too? Where is
your consistency, Mr Blair?
Finally,
on the question of Europe, Mr Blair's Achilles' heel, people have had
enough. Only two thirds ever wanted to join the tariff-free trading bloc
known as the 'Common Market'. However, the Westminster Establishment elite
never consulted them about whether they wanted to belong to The 'European
Economic Community', or the 'European Community', or the 'European Union'.
The people were never consulted about whether they wanted metrication,
whether they wanted to sign the Conservative-imposed Maastricht Treaty,
or whether they wanted 'European Union' stamped all over their royal blue
British passports.
Of
course not, because the political oligarchs, Conservative or New Labour,
knew that we would say no. Now Mr Blair continues heedlessly. But the
only person that his signature on the European Constitution binds is himself.
Seldom has this country endured such an anti-English Prime Minister, with
his regionalist campaign against the integrity of England, which is supported
by the dissatisfied members of minorities in his government: Scottish
nationalists, children of Jewish immigrants, homosexuals and others.
The
present Blair government, like virtually all British governments, is a
minority government. It was elected by 28% of the electorate. Like most
'democratic' British governments, it is undemocratic. Yet power seems
to have gone to Mr Blair's head and he deludes himself into thinking that
he can do whatever he wants.
Could
it be that the recent election results are going to change all that? Could
it be that the old political elites of Labour and Conservative, with their
anti-democratic vested interests in a two-party system, are finished?
Could it be that finally the foolishness of the 60s and 70s, which attempted
to throw away our national heritage and traditional values and tried to
merge us into a European Superstate, is over?
Could
it be that, in a country ruled by faceless bureaucrats and Soviet-style
accountants, with their 'plans' and 'targets', we are going to have freedom
at last? Could it be that in a land where words like 'values' 'patriotism'
and 'national identity' were long ago brushed under the carpet like so-much
dust, we are facing the first green shoots of a revival of national consciousness?
Could it be that the voice of a free, independent, sovereign England,
leading all the Isles to freedom, is to be heard again?
You
have definitely overstayed your welcome, Mr Blair. It is time for you
to leave before you do any more damage. It does not matter who replaces
you. Anything would be better than this.
1) Lenin: 'Uchites', uchites', uchites'.
|
|
|
|