|
|
Return to Home Page
Regeneration or Degeneration:
Orthodoxy and the Crisis of Neo-Paganism
The 2004 Episcopal Council of the Russian Orthodox Church from 3rd to
8th October has come to an end. It is clear that the Russian Orthodox
Church, both inside and outside Russia, is returning to the canonical
norms of the Orthodox Church. In report after report, in terms with which
no Orthodox can disagree, the Council made clear that progress is being
made towards the restoration of Church Life, but that there is still much
to do. The bitter heritage of three generations of Soviet oppression is
still felt in Russian society. Notably, Patriarch Alexis and Metropolitan
Kyrill have spoken, in terms reminiscent of those used by the Russian
Orthodox Church Outside Russia since the 1960s, of the links between terrorism,
immorality and the demographic crisis in Russia. The link is Neo-Paganism
- the bitter fruit of three generations of atheism.
Terrorism
is indeed the fruit of paganism, the concept that innocent human beings,
including women and children, can be taken hostage, maimed and massacred.
By definition terrorism lives in a moral void. And immorality is also
the fruit of paganism, the concept that human life exists only for selfish,
sensual, depravity, with the result that the victims of immorality see
their lives destroyed by drugs and AIDS and that tens of millions of children
are aborted or abandoned. By definition, immorality lives in a moral void.
The result is both physical and spiritual sterility. According to the
October 1st edition of the British journal The Economist, the population
of Russia is now in steep decline. On paper, the Russians as a race could
almost disappear within a hundred years, if there is no change, if, quite
literally, there is no rebirth, no regeneration.
The
problem is a spiritual one. The fact is that Russia has only ever known
two systems. One is Orthodoxy, the other is paganism. Whenever Russia
rejects Orthodoxy, it falls back into paganism, be it primitive, pre-Orthodox
materialistic animism, or post-Orthodox materialistic Communism, or Western
consumerism. However, the problem is also worldwide, for the whole globalized
world is going through a process of the rebirth of paganism. Both terrorism
and immorality are worldwide phenomena, evidence of the rebirth of paganism,
of Neo-Paganism.
By
Neo-Paganism we do not mean primitive pagan religions, such as one can
find in parts of Asia, Africa and elsewhere, with their fetishism and
animism. Here there is ignorance of Christ. But here there are also moralities,
albeit primitive, manmade ones. By Neo-Paganism neither do we do mean
various manmade philosophies such as Buddhism. Here there is ignorance
of Christ. But here there are also moralities, albeit sophisticated, manmade
ones.
By
Neo-Paganism we do not mean falling back into the Jewish Old Testament
moral law of vengeance, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. This
is the foundation of two Old Testament religions, Judaism and Islam, which
both rejected the New Testament Revelation of Christ, the Unique Revelation
of Love and Forgiveness. Their Old Testament moral law is not pagan, it
is still a morality, although it does explain why the problems of the
Middle East are intractable. Until both sides forgive one another, they
are doomed to an everlasting vicious circle of bloody struggle, as has
been witnessed for well over fifty years, as is witnessed daily in Gaza
and elsewhere.
By
Neo-Paganism we mean the rejection of all moral values, the apostasy from
Christ by people once converted to Him and their rejection even of pagan
religions, manmade philosophies and Old Testament moral law. How else,
for example, can the brutal beheading of hostages in Iraq be explained?
The human sacrifices there are pure evil. Neo-Paganism is worse even than
the original paganism, which was a paganism of ignorance. Christ has come
into the world. Those who have not heard of him have an excuse. Apostates
have no excuse.
Christians
cannot pride themselves either that they have accepted Christ's Teaching.
The whole history of Christianity has been a constant falling back into
the Old Testament. It can be seen especially in Protestantism, which even
systematically refuses the Christian Old Testament in favour of the Jewish
one. But Catholicism and even historic Orthodoxy have at times fallen
back into Old Testament ways. Christians can indeed accuse themselves
that Neo-Paganism has come into the world, because we were unable to show
Christ by example to the Non-Christian world.
These
tendencies can be seen in the Orthodox world. Two great trends can be
seen eating into our Orthodox world. The first is the lapse into the Old
Testament, the other the lapse into secularism.
On
the one hand, there are those who would make our Orthodox Christianity
into a mere shell of a religion, just another nationalist ghetto. They
would, for example, try to canonize Ivan the Terrible or Rasputin, simply
because they are of a certain nationality and are well-known to history.
This is the religion of the Jews, who rejected the New Testament in favour
of a national cult, refusing Christ, because He did not justify them and
instead preached to the whole world. And His Church followed Him, preaching
in the languages of the world. Beware, their Jewish values are the values
of apostasy, they are the values which give birth to Neo-Paganism, where
anything goes.
On
the other hand, there are those who would make our Orthodox Christianity
into a mere shell of a religion, just another form of secularist humanism.
They would swim with the tide, merge with secular Western values, simply
because that is the easy way out. This is the religion of the Greeks,
who rejected the New Testament in favour of an easy way of life, refusing
Christ, because He did not justify their world and instead preached the
other world. And His Church followed Him, preaching in the language of
Christ, not that of Neo-Puritan political correctness. Beware, their secular
values are the values of apostasy, they are the values which give birth
to Neo-Paganism, where anything goes.
Between
the racist Jews and the humanist Greeks stands the Cross. The Cross of
Christ stands between extremes. The Cross thus becomes the place of creativity,
because creativity is born out of the creative tension its place between
extremes. As the Apostle preached: But we preach Christ crucified,
unto the Jews a stumbling-block, and unto the Greeks foolishness (1
Cor 1,23). A stumbling-block and foolishness, because the place of the
Cross is not only the place of the Crucifixion, but also the place of
New Life, of the Resurrection. And the Resurrection is what, with its
kiss of death, life-hating Neo-Paganism rejects as a stumbling-block and
foolishness.
The
choice is clear:
The
Risen Christ and Personal, Social, National and International Regeneration.
Or:
Neo-Paganism
and Personal, Social, National and International Degeneration.
Let
the world decide.
Fr
Andrew
25
September/ 8 October 2004
St Sergius of Radonezh
|
|
|
|