|
|
Return to Home Page
On
Zeal
They
have a zeal, but not according to knowledge. For they being ignorant of
God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness,
have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
Romans 10, 2-3
There is
a well-known saying that: 'Born Orthodox have knowledge, but converts
have zeal. What we need, however, is both zeal and knowledge'. There is
of course truth in this, but the saying in the above form is objectionable
for three important reasons.
Firstly,
it must be said that there is no such thing as 'born Orthodox'. We do
not become Orthodox until we are baptized. Secondly, the saying is objectionable,
because the word 'convert' is quite inappropriate. The only converts to
the Church are those who were converted today. Everyone else is an ex-convert,
in other words, they are simply Orthodox. Thus, I cannot find reference
in the Scriptures to the Mother of God or the Apostles as 'converts'.
True, the Apostle Paul was 'converted' on the Road to Damascus, but after
that he ceased to be a convert. And so we all cease to be 'converts',
Western European, Eastern European (and most of them are new Orthodox
too), Middle Eastern, North American, or anyone else. Finally, the above
saying is false in this form, because both many lifelong Orthodox and
many new Orthodox may have neither zeal nor knowledge. In fact, if we
were to make the above saying into a Christian and accurate one, then
we might instead say: 'Lifelong Orthodox often have knowledge, but those
new to the faith often have zeal'. Now let us look at this Orthodox form
of the saying more deeply.
First of
all, zeal. Although the words 'zeal' and 'zealous' have positive associations,
the words 'zealot' and 'zealotry' generally do not, carrying undertones
of fanaticism. However, there are different forms of zealot fanaticism.
There are those who condemn all others who do not share their faith (their
parents included, thus breaking the Fifth Commandment) and become troublemakers
in their parish, with hatred and condemnation for anyone who is not as
bigoted and narrow-minded as themselves. But there are others who set
about 'reforming' the very Church that they have joined - because it is
not 'modern enough' for them. Personally, I have met more of the latter
'liberal zealots' than the former pharisaical ones, but I would not suggest
that overall the pharisees are any less numerous than the modernists.
Thus, we see that zealotry, or fanaticism, can go in any direction. Our
conclusion is that zeal in itself is merely a tool, like any other form
of energy; in itself neutral, it must be channelled, like any other energy.
In reality,
the problem with zeal is that if it is not channelled, it will attach
itself to externals. Thus, the zealot who insists that everyone in his
or her parish must be dressed identically. Anyone who does not is to be
condemned and cast out of the sect. Thus, the zealot who insists that
everyone in his or her parish must read the books of their ecumenist guru.
Anyone who does not is to be condemned and cast out of the sect. Typically,
the new Orthodox who has not yet become Orthodox, who in fact still deserves
to be called 'a convert', has not yet grown out of such attachment to
externals. It is then the attachment to externals which makes zeal dangerous.
Therefore,
when we speak of the need to channel zeal, we are in fact talking about
the need to 'internalize' zeal. To make zeal internal, we are talking
about doing something far harder than condemning others, because they
do not conform to our own self-invented external standards. To internalize
zeal is to stand through all the services praying, discreetly, preferably
at the back of the church. It is to say our prayers at home, making prostrations
to use up our physical energy. It is to keep the fasts secretly, without
talking about them. It is not to talk about ourselves, but to listen and
to observe. It is to read the daily Gospel and Epistle quietly at home.
It is to go to confession discreetly and regularly, with sincere repentance
and self-reproach. It is simply to keep the commandments.
The fact
is that there are two types of zeal, external and internal. External zeal
judges others, it is fleshly, full of censoriousness and sensuality, spreading
its 'own righteousness'. Only internal zeal is good. Why? Quite simply,
because it is self-judging, it is spiritual, full of humility and purity,
spreading 'the righteousness of God'. For, as it is written: 'Blessed
are the meek', not 'Blessed are the zealous'.
Fr
Andrew
August 2006
|
|
|
|