|
|
Return to Home Page
TOWARDS
REAL ORTHODOXY
That
good thing which was committed unto thee, keep by the Holy Ghost which
dwelleth in us.
2 Timothy 1, 14
Foreword
Orthodoxy,
Eastern Orthodoxy, Greek Orthodoxy, Russian Orthodoxy, Romanian Orthodoxy:
whatever name it is given, it is surrounded by ignorance, myths, inventions
and fantasies. Perhaps the greatest of these is the myth that Orthodoxy
is different from Christianity. Let us be clear from the very beginning:
Orthodoxy is Christianity. The two words mean exactly the same thing.
Anything that calls itself Christianity and is not Orthodoxy is something
less than Christianity. And anything that calls itself Orthodoxy and is
not Christianity is something less than Orthodoxy.
You can
call it Roman Catholicism, Anglicanism, Evangelism, Baptism, Methodism,
Pentecostalism, anything you like. However, if it is not Orthodoxy, it
is not Christianity, and if it is not Christianity, it is not Orthodoxy,
but a reductionist, manmade adaptation of it. True, the words Orthodox
and Christianity, and Orthodox and Christian, are often put together to
make ‘Orthodox Christianity’ and ‘Orthodox Christian’,
but only in contexts where people might not otherwise understand and be
confused. The words Orthodoxy and Christianity, the words Orthodox and
Christian, mean exactly the same, they are synonyms.
It is therefore
curious to see how sometimes newcomers to Orthodoxy confuse Orthodoxy
with something other than Real Christianity, Real Orthodoxy, so creating
a false Orthodoxy and a false Christianity. The source of such confusion
is in a non-spiritual approach to Christianity/Orthodoxy. This non-spiritual
approach takes two different illusory forms, created by two sorts of temptations.
The first temptation is that of the body, resulting from an external,
physical approach. The second temptation is that of the mind, resulting
from an intellectual, rationalistic approach. Since both sorts of temptation
are superficial, they are not spiritual, and therefore do not lead to
a Christian/Orthodox way of life.
The
First Temptation
There
is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
I Cor 15, 44
The first temptation of some new to the Orthodox Church (because that
is the only place where Christianity/Orthodoxy can be confessed) is to
muddle the outward with the inward, confusing externals with internals.
For example, we have sometimes seen how those new to the Church imitate
what they think Orthodox ‘look like’, a fantasy which seems
to be obtained from books. This can mean men growing long beards and long
hair (so disobeying the words of the Apostle in 1 Cor 11, 14) and women
wearing nineteenth-century clothes and putting impossibly huge headscarves
over their heads. In such cases, both sexes may dress in black, displaying
large crosses and, on their wrists, prayer-knots, in a manner exaggerating
that of Orthodox monks and nuns (who do not wear crosses). Sometimes,
both sexes may spend long hours talking about strange fasting foods and
spend large sums on them. Sometimes, both sexes also wish to change ordinary
Christian names to exotic Christian names.
In over
thirty years of Orthodox life, I have never met any ‘ordinary’
Orthodox behaving or dressing in the above way. Since Orthodoxy is simply
Christianity, it most certainly does not involve bizarre ways of dressing
or hairstyle. Neither does it mean non-monastics pretending to be monastics.
And certainly the aim of Orthodoxy is not to eat strange foods. The aim
of fasting is not to talk about food, still less eat it, be it fasting
food or non-fasting food, but to spend less time eating and talking, and
more time praying. And one of the benefits of fasting is spending less
money on food and giving the money saved to good causes. In everyday life,
‘normal’ Orthodox, who may have been baptised ‘Dmitri’,
Theophilus, ‘Haralambos’ or ‘Vladimir’, often
modify their names to ‘Jim’, Theo’, ‘Harry’
or ‘Walter’. Newcomers, on the other hand, sometimes do the
opposite, trying to change names like ‘Antony’, ‘Michael’,
‘Peter’ and ‘John’ to ‘Vladimir’,
‘Auxentius’, ‘Rostislav’ and ‘Theologos’.
Why? Who knows.
I plead
with such newcomers to the Orthodox Church to get through this phase as
swiftly as possible, if possible before they are received into the Church,
and to start living like other Orthodox. They should look around. If they
care to visit ordinary Orthodox churches, they will not find anyone dressed
bizarrely. They will not find a single woman wearing a gigantic headscarf,
they will rarely find a single man with a long beard (except for the priest,
and his beard may be short and, perhaps like his hair, trimmed). They
will not see a single person wearing prayer-knots around their wrists
– for the simple reason that the other people in church are not
monks or nuns, but married or single laypeople, who have not taken on
the obediences of monastic life inside a monastery or convent. Regarding
crosses, Orthodox do not wear them on the outside of their clothes, they
do not even display them; small metal neck-crosses are worn inside our
clothes, next to our hearts. And people rarely discuss the boring topic
of food (unless, of course they own or work in restaurants, and even then
they tend to change the topic swiftly – who wants to talk about
work on a day off?).
A superficial,
physical view of Orthodoxy is not only strange, but it can also be spiritually
dangerous. A strange external appearance, not an imitation at all, fails
to understand that Orthodoxy is simply Christianity, it fails to understand
that Orthodoxy is simply the Christian way of life. It reduces the Faith
to an external and immodest show. And in failing to understand this, it
can, in certain circumstances, degenerate, becoming pretentious, both
in the sense of pretending to be what it is not, but also developing into
pride. This pretentiousness can lead to people referring to themselves
as ‘slaves of God’ (we are not called to be ‘slaves’
of God but servants and children of God). It can lead to people signing
letters with the word ‘the unworthy’, ‘the sinful’
before their names. Let monks and nuns do this. But let the rest of us
refrain from this: we already know that we are all unworthy and sinful
– we have no illusions about ourselves. It can lead to the backbiting
and gossiping of little hothouse groups, who gather together in order
to criticise others.
Such criticism
and aggressiveness towards others come from insecurity. Not surprisingly,
those who come into the Orthodox Church and think that Orthodoxy is about
a fantasy imitation of supposed externals, which in reality do not exist
in any Orthodox parish, will not last long in the Church, precisely because
they are insecure. They will usually find that the Church is ‘not
good enough’ for them, that they are well on their way to lapsing
completely. The convert complex, the disease of the neophyte, is actually
rooted in pride, the wish to be ‘better’ than everyone else.
The curious thing is that when such people do fall away from the Church,
they rarely blame themselves, but always ‘the Church’, which
is ‘not good enough’ for them.
The
best away to avoid this temptation is to start looking at other Orthodox,
at people have been Orthodox for decades and generations and to accept
obedience. I knew a young man who turned up in an Orthodox church with
long hair and a long beard, dressed in black clothes, and asked the priest
if he could become Orthodox. When the priest told him that the first thing
he needed to do was to have a haircut and shave and dress normally, the
young man revolted and left. His refusal to accept a small dose of humility
and obedience meant that he did not become Orthodox, and in more than
one sense. The spiritual disease of the neophyte imitating externals,
is to be overcome as quickly as possible. After a few months of frequenting
an Orthodox church, it is time to become Orthodox. It is time to leave
the first course of the meal and to come to the main course, to enter
the arena, for only this will lead to our ‘dessert’ –
salvation. However, there is yet another sort of temptation to overcome
before we can begin this main course.
The
Second Temptation
Knowledge
puffeth up, but love edifieth. And if any man think that he knoweth any
thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know
I Cor 8, 1-2
For
newcomers to the Church who are of a more intellectual frame of mind,
there is another and perhaps still greater temptation. This is to turn
Orthodoxy/Christianity into a mere set of ideas, booklore, a bookish cult.
In reality, Orthodoxy/Christianity is not an idea, it is a way of life,
the faith lived. Look at other Orthodox; they do not necessarily read
piles of books and yet they have a faith stronger than piles of University
professors. I know elderly Orthodox who have never read the Bible in their
lives, and yet when they speak, they speak the Bible. How is it possible?
It is simply because all their lives they have been to church, they have
been bathed in a way of life impregnated with the living Scriptures. They
do not read the Bible, because, much more importantly, they live
it.
The intellectual
mentality often degenerates into mere rationalism. What we need, they
say, is a new form of Orthodoxy, a better one, a reformed version. In
other words, as worldly people, they want to invent their own religion,
reducing Orthodoxy/Christianity to the size of their reason. They want
to reduce eternal and infinite spiritual reality to the tiny neatness
of their limited created minds, rather than humbly accept a drop of the
limitless greatness of the grace of God, far beyond human reason and social
conditioning. This spirit of rationalism does not come from the Church;
they bring it with them from the outside, like so many holiday suitcases,
full of unneeded clothes.
Then, demands
start. First of all, there are those who demand that the secret prayers
and the Eucharistic Canon be shouted out during the Divine Liturgy. Apparently,
salvation is only possible for them, if this is done, for, as they say,
‘everyone must understand’. But we have not come to church
to understand what cannot be understood anyway, we have come to pray,
to purify our hearts. Only when our hearts are purified will our minds
begin to be enlightened and so understand. Spiritual enlightenment, true
education, begins in the heart and then spreads to the mind, and not the
other way round. For the mind is merely a tool, whereas without the heart
we suffer both physical and spiritual death.
However,
this is not acceptable to those who think that the proud and sinful human
mind can understand everything. Their next demand may be that the iconostasis
be removed from their local church. Naturally, they have no concept of
the sacred, or of the sacrifices that previous generations made to set
up the iconostasis in their church. Then, of course, the calendar must
be changed, so that ‘we can be like everyone else’. Unknown
are the Scriptures, which say that we are not like everyone else, that
we Christians are a race apart: But ye are a chosen generation, a
royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people (I Peter 2, 9).
What next?
Well, of course, we must get rid of all these strange and irrational,
‘anti-feminist’ customs, that women cover their heads modestly
in church (in obedience to the words of the Apostle in 1 Cor 11, 5), that
women do not take communion during menstruation, that mothers do not go
to church for forty days after childbirth (since both menstruation and
childbirth are involuntary consequences of the Fall). Once they have eliminated
all of the above ‘customs’, then, of course, why not have
deaconesses and priestesses – ‘like everyone else?’
And on the subject of everyone else, we must have ‘ecumenism’
and intercommunion. In fact, why not destroy the Church completely and
start all over again? What a pity the Holy Spirit has been wrong for all
these 2,000 years, when only they were right. Clearly, they are God’s
gift to mankind.
Such is
the logic of the rationalist. Such is the obstacle to reaching the main
course of the meal, to reaching what is above reason, the supra-rational.
Such rationalism is the result of pride and self-flattery. Pride can be
seen in the desire of the rationalist to avoid confession (one of the
hallmarks of the rationalistic approach) and to take communion at every
single Liturgy. However, to refuse confession, in the words of the Evangelist
John the Theologian, is self-deceit, for there is no man without sin and
we all need confession (I John 1, 8-10). And communion without confession
will only lead to the sickness described by the Apostle Paul in 1 Cor
11, 29. The rationalistic, anti-mystical approach to Church life is in
fact the quickest exit from the Church, because it denies the essence
of the Church, which is mystery. Sadly, there are those who have taken
this exit.
Afterword
Now
the end of the commandment is love out of a pure heart, and of a good
conscience, and of faith unfeigned: From which some, having swerved, have
turned aside unto vain jangling.
I
Timothy 1, 5-6
Several years ago I remember hearing an anecdote about an elderly Russian
woman commenting on the behaviour of a zealous young convert: ‘He’s
certainly Orthodox’, she said, ‘but is he Christian?’
What she meant was that he observed all the externals, in fact he observed
them to the exclusion of everything else, and, as a result, he observed
none of the internals. In the words of the proverb, ‘he could
not see the wood for the trees’. In the words of the Apostle,
he suffered from ‘zeal not according to knowledge’.
Outwardly he was Orthodox, but inwardly he tended to resemble a ravening
wolf. In any case, he did not live a Christian/Orthodox way of life. Zeal
was without experience.
The conclusion
must be that those who are new to the Church need first to follow the
examples of others around them, who have never known anything other than
Orthodoxy/Christianity. Hence the danger of parishes where, unfortunately,
there are only newcomers to the Church. They can become unhealthy hothouses.
Sadly, I have known people who have never got over their period as neophytes
and all their lives remained ‘converts’, even describing themselves
as such (for that is what they feel). This is because they have never
passed through the first course of the meal and reached the main course,
they have never been into the arena. How then will they get to the ‘dessert’?
Our
summary of ‘Towards Real Orthodoxy’ is seven words: Be
humble, be simple and be modest. For is this not the message
of the Gospels? Why complicate Christian/Orthodox life? Be humble,
be simple and be modest. That is all there is to it.
|
|
|
|